Gilathief (gilathief) wrote,
Gilathief
gilathief

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Hasta La Vista Artists?

When the National Endowment for the Arts was created in 1965, it was proposed as a democratization of culture, a way of bringing high art to the masses and building a nation whose cultural influence in the world could rival its military dominance. With the Soviet Union vanquished by the early '90s and agreement about aesthetic judgments increasingly difficult in a postmodern world, America's arts leaders spent the next decade talking up the practical usefulness of the arts.

Jobs, tax revenue, tourism, urban redevelopment, academic performance, community building, at-risk youth — the California Arts Council Web site makes the case that just about every practical benefit you can think of flows from the arts. Why, the arts even "sustain brain development," "promote healing" and help in "treating Alzheimer's." Maybe the arts also whiten and brighten teeth (expect the studies any day). But no matter how many practical arguments are mustered, they can always be trumped by competing needs for food, medicine, shelter and protection.


A great article about funding for the arts. It focuses on California, but the implications are the same everywhere. (I bolded my favorite line; it was just too funny not to emphasize. The story can be found at Arts Jounal in my links above.

Oh and check out my new icon, Mary Chapin Carpenter, a goddess with words.


Also, check out this story from Arts and Letters Daily.
How Fair are the Nobel Awards?
Tags: links
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments